Title I: Relating to Employment and Medical
Examinations/Inquiries
What are the general legal obligations on medical examinations
and inquiries under the ADA?
The ADA does not prevent employers from obtaining medical and
related information necessary to evaluate the ability of applicants
and employees to perform essential job functions, or to promote
health and safety on the job. However, to protect individuals with
disabilities from actions based on such information that are not
job-related and consistent with business necessity, including
protection of health and safety, the ADA imposes specific and
differing obligations on the employer at three stages of the
employment process:
- Before making a job offer, an employer may not make any
medical inquiry or conduct any medical examination.
- After making a conditional job offer, before a person
starts work, an employer may make unrestricted medical inquiries,
but may not refuse to hire an individual with a disability based
on results of such inquiries, unless the reason for rejection is
job-related and justified by business necessity.
- After employment, any medical examination or inquiry
required of an employee must be job-related and justified by
business necessity. Exceptions are voluntary examinations
conducted as part of employee health programs and examinations
required by other federal laws.
What are the requirements at the pre-employment, pre-offer
stage?
The ADA prohibits medical inquiries or medical examinations
before making a conditional job offer to an applicant. This
prohibition is necessary because the results of such inquiries and
job examinations frequently are used to exclude people with
disabilities from jobs they are able to perform.
Some employers have medical policies or rely on doctors' medical
assessments that overestimate the impact of a particular condition
on a particular individual, and/or underestimate the ability of an
individual to cope with his or her condition. Medical policies that
focus on disability, rather than the ability of a particular person,
frequently will be discriminatory under the ADA.'
What examination and inquiries are permitted in the
pre-employment, post-offer phase?
An employer may condition a job offer on the satisfactory result
of a post-offer medical examination or medical inquiry if this is
required of all entering employees in the same job category. A
post-offer medical examination does not have to be given to all
entering employees in all jobs, only to those in the same job
category.
The ADA does not require an employer to justify its requirement
of a post-offer medical examination. An employer may wish to conduct
a post-offer medical exam or make post-offer medical inquiries for
purposes such as:
- To determine if an individual currently has the physical or
mental qualifications necessary to perform certain jobs;
- To determine that a person can perform a job without posing a
"direct threat" to the health or safety of self or others;
- Compliance with medical requirements of other Federal laws.
Employers also may conduct post-offer medical examinations that
are required by state laws, but, may not take actions based on such
examinations if the state law is inconsistent with ADA requirements.
After making a conditional job offer, an employer may make
inquiries or conduct examinations to get any information that it
believes to be relevant to a person's ability to perform a job.
A post-offer medical examination or inquiry, made before an
individual starts work, need not focus on ability to perform job
functions. Such inquiries and examinations themselves, unlike
examinations/inquiries of employees, do not have to be "job-related"
and "consistent with business necessity." However, if a conditional
job offer is withdrawn because of the results of such examination or
inquiry, an employer must be able to show that:
- the reasons for the exclusion are job-related and consistent with
business necessity, or the person is being excluded to avoid a
"direct threat" to health or safety; and that
- no reasonable accommodation was available that would enable this
person to perform the essential job functions without a significant
risk to health or safety, or that such an accommodation would cause
undue hardship.
How is "risk of future harm to self or others" assessed?
The results of a medical injury or examination may not be used to
disqualify persons who care currently able to perform the essential
functions of a job, either with or without an accommodation, because
of fear or speculation that a disability may indicate a greater risk
of future injury, or absenteeism, or may cause future workers'
compensation or insurance costs. An employer may use such
information to exclude an individual with a disability where there
is specific medical documentation, reflecting current medical
knowledge, that this individual would pose a significant, current
risk of substantial harm to health or safety.
Under the ADA, "medical" documentation concerning the
qualifications of an individual constitutes a "direct threat" to
health and safety, does not mean only information from medical
doctors. It may be necessary to obtain information from other
sources, such as rehabilitation experts, occupational or physical
therapists, psychologists, and others knowledgeable about the
individual and the disability concerned. It also may be more
relevant to look at the individual's previous work history in making
such determinations than to rely on an examination or tests by a
physician.
Any medical assessment should focus on only two concerns: 1)
whether this person currently is able to perform this specific job,
with out without an accommodation and 2) whether this person can
perform this job without posing a "direct threat" to the health or
safety or the person or others.
When an individual is rejected on the basis of a "direct threat"
to health and safety:
 | the employer must be prepared to show a significant current risk
of substantial harm (not from a speculative or remote risk); |
 | the specific risk must be identified; |
 | the risk must be documented by objective medical or other factual
evidence regarding the particular individual; |
 | even if a genuine significant risk of substantial harm exists,
the employer must consider whether it can be eliminated or reduced
below the level of a "direct threat" by reasonable accommodation. |
A doctor's evaluation of any future risk must be supported by
valid medical analysis indicating a high probability of substantial
harm if this individual performed the particular functions of the
particular job in question. Conclusions of general medical studies
about work restrictions for people with certain disabilities will
not be sufficient evidence, because they do not relate to a
particular individual and do not consider reasonable accommodation.
What does the ADA say about confidentiality and limitations on
use of medical information?
All information obtained from post-offer medical examinations and
inquiries must be collected and maintained on separate forms, in
separate medical files and must treated as a confidential medical
record. Therefore, an employer should not place any medical-related
material in an employee's personnel file.
All medical-related information must be kept confidential, with
the following exceptions:
 | Supervisors and managers may be informed about necessary
restrictions on the work or duties of an employee and necessary
accommodations. |
 | First aid and safety personnel may be informed, when appropriate,
if the disability might require emergency treatment or if any
specific procedures are needed in the case of fire or other
evacuations. |
 | Government officials investigating compliance with ADA and other
Federal and state laws prohibiting discrimination on the basis of
disability or handicap should be provided relevant information on
request. |
 | Relevant information may be provided to state workers'
compensation offices or "second injury" funds, in accordance with
state workers' compensation laws. |
 | Relevant information may be provided to insurance companies where
the company requires a medical examination to provide health or life
insurance for employees. |
Are voluntary "wellness" and health screening programs
permissible?
An employer may conduct voluntary medical examinations and
inquires as part of an employee health program (such as medical
screening for high blood pressure, weight control, and cancer
detection), providing that: 1) participation in the program is
voluntary; 2) information obtained is maintained according to the
confidentiality requirements of the ADA; and 3) this information is
not used to discriminate against an employee.
What does the ADA permit with respect to medical examinations and
inquiries of current employees?
The ADA's requirements concerning medical examinations and
inquiries of employees are more stringent than those affecting
applicants who are being evaluated for employment after a
conditional job offer. IN order for a medical examination or inquiry
to be made of an employee, it must be job-related and consistent
with business necessity. The need for the examination may be
triggered by some evidence of problems related to job performance or
safety, or an examination may be necessary to determine whether
individuals in physically demanding jobs continue to be fit for
duty. In either case, the scope of the examination also must be
job-related.
Medical examinations or inquires may be job-related and necessary
under several circumstances:
- When an employee is having difficulty performing his or her job
effectively;
- When an employee becomes disabled; or
- Examination necessary for reasonable accommodations.
|